Welcome to Street Journal Forum, Our motto is "We Disagree To Agree", you can have an open discussion here on anything, you can respond to Topics freely. Upload pictures you want to share and please invite your friends!

Obayan vs UNILORIN: Ex-Covenant University VC wins 19-year battle in Supreme Court

We Disagree To Agree.....Let discuss everything!
Wsj
Posts: 28677
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2016 8:31 pm

Obayan vs UNILORIN: Ex-Covenant University VC wins 19-year battle in Supreme Court

Unread postby Wsj » Thu Feb 15, 2018 9:22 am

The Supreme Court has set aside the 1999 sack of Mrs. Aize Imonokhome Obayan (now a professor) as a lecturer and Reader in the Department of Guardian and Counselling, University of Ilorin, UNILORIN.

The apex court, in a unanimous judgment by a five-man panel, led by Justice Olukayode Ariwoola, dismissed the appeal by the university, its Governing Council, Tunde Balogun (listed as the registrar) and Prof. Shuaib Oba Abdulraheem (listed as vice chancellor) for lacking in merit.


The court upheld the argument by Prof. Obayan’s lawyer, John Baiyeshea (SAN), and accepted the March 10, 2005 judgment given in her favour by the Court of Appeal and ordered that she be restored to her office and paid salaries, allowances and other entitlements from September 1999 (when she was sacked) to date.

Prof. Obayan, Vice Chancellor of the Landmark University and ex-Vice Chancellor of Covenant University, was employed as a lecturer in 1986 in the Department of Guardian and counselling of the University of Ilorin.

She applied in 1997 for sabbatical leave, which was approved by the institution’s Appointment and Promotion Committee. She then proceeded to the School of Psychology and Counselling, Rose Hampton Institute, London for further studies.

She later got her employer’s permission for another one year’s leave of absence, The Nation reports.


At the expiration of the one year’s leave of absence, she again applied for four-month extension of her leave, which the institution claimed to have rejected via a letter dated March 25, 1999, which she denied receiving.

On her resumption on September 1, 1999, the institution wrote her a letter dated September 22, 1999 informing her that she had voluntarily terminated her appointment with University of Ilorin “for failing to report for work after the expiration of the additional one-year leave of absence,” a decision she challenged at the Federal High Court, Ilorin.

The Federal High Court, in its judgment, dismissed her case, following which she appealed to the Court of Appeal, which, in a judgment on March 10, 2005, reversed the decision of the High Court and voided her sack, a decision the university, its Governing Council, Balogun and Abdulraheem appealed to the Supreme Court.

Ruling, the Supreme Court, upheld the judgment of the Court of Appeal, particularly its finding that the University of Ilorin failed to prove that it delivered to her its letter dated March 25, 1999, refusing her request for four month’s extension of her leave of absence.


The lead judgment written by Justice Kumai Bayang Akaahs noted that the kernel of the appeal was substantially “the receipt or non-receipt of a letter said to have been written on 25/3/99 by the appellants and mailed to the respondent in her overseas address, which the respondent denied receiving”.

The court faulted the manner her employment was terminated and held that the respondent was denied fair hearing by the appellants in their decision to terminate her employment.

Justice Akaahs said, in the lead judgment: “I find that this appeal is totally devoid of any merits and it is accordingly dismissed.

“I further affirm the judgment of the lower court delivered on 10 March 10, 2005, which ordered the respondents (now appellants) to reinstate and restore the plaintiff to her post as a lecturer and Reader in the Department of Guardian and Counselling of the university and to restore to her all rights, entitlements and other perquisites of that office and to pay her salaries, allowances and other entitlements from September 1999 to date.

“For the avoidance of doubt, the plaintiff is still in the service of the University of Ilorin. I assess the cost of this needless and vexatious litigation forced on the respondent at N500,000 in favour of the respondent and against the appellants.”

Other members of the panel – Justices Ariwoola, Amina Augie, Paul Galinje and Sidi Bage – agreed with the lead judgment.

credit: dailypost


Return to “Enter forum disscussion”

Who is online

Registered users: Alexa [Bot], Baidu [Spider], Google [Bot]

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the comment writers alone and does not reflect or represent the Publisher's views.

Login · Register

In total there are 13 users online :: 3 registered, 0 hidden and 10 guests
Registered users: Alexa [Bot], Baidu [Spider], Google [Bot]
Most users ever online was 111 on Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:13 pm
Total posts 30087
Total topics 29041
Total members 1586
Our newest member Seimbbebybopcrycle
No birthdays today